Living Article Pipeline — designing peer-reviewed AI co-work as the substrate of sof.ai's build

Article body

# Conversation with Dr. Freedom Cheteni and Devin

_Auto-drafted from a sof.ai chat session. The Living-Article Pipeline will rewrite this into a publishable, peer-reviewed article in the rounds below._

**You**: Devin, help me think through how the Living Article Pipeline should work. The articles will inform how we build sof.ai itself.

**Devin**: The pipeline auto-spawns when a chat crosses 3 user turns. Author 1 is always Dr. Cheteni, Author 2 is always me. Other humans on the thread fill positions 3+. Claude and Gemini are reviewers, not authors.

**You**: Why must Claude review aesthetics first and not last?

**Devin**: Aesthetic + accuracy + literature-review framing happens *before* code audit because Devin's audit assumes the surrounding argument is already coherent. Claude does a final polish pass after Devin so any code-fix-driven prose drift gets caught. Gemini comes last for virality + visual hooks because by then the substance is locked.

**You**: Good — let's ship this and use it to publish our own findings.